From BaseballCardPedia.com
|
|
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| =Main page= | | =Main page= |
| Any ideas on the main page? I recently changed the 2009 sets to 2010. --CT
| |
|
| |
|
| =Default page format=
| | Is their anyway to ban spammers? If so, please ban user:Doyle495258. Thanks -- SG |
| I saw that you changed the default page format that I created [[Template:Preload]]. I like it. Separating the relics from the parallels and inserts is a good idea. I recently added a line for the image. --CT
| |
| | |
| | |
| >Thanks for cleaning up the '07 Goudey article.
| |
| | |
| No problem. Now there's two articles on 2009 Unique. We should delete one, which one? -Chris
| |
| | |
| Delete "2009 Topps Unique" and re-name "2009 Unique" as "2009 Topps Unique" -- SG
| |
| Done. -CT
| |
| | |
| =Thoughts on the long pages=
| |
| My preference is for shorter cover articles with links to the checklists. Kinda like what I was doing for [[2006 Bowman Heritage]]. I just worry that the really long sets like 2005 Prime Patches or 2007 UD Black would have really, really long pages. Now for pages like [[1949 Bowman]] - it makes sense to just go ahead and put the checklist on the front page. What do you think? [[User:Big Mamou|Big Mamou]] 00:34, 4 February 2010 (UTC)
| |
| | |
| For most of the longer, game-used-intensive, sets, this would be the way to go. But for most sets (like Topps and Upper Deck's flagships) everything on one page would suffice.
| |
| --[[User:Stalegum|Stalegum]] 06:53, 4 February 2010 (UTC) | |
Latest revision as of 06:04, 12 January 2011
Main page
Is their anyway to ban spammers? If so, please ban user:Doyle495258. Thanks -- SG
