User talk:Stalegum - Revision history

Stalegum at 06:04, 12 January 2011

2011-01-12T06:04:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:04, 12 January 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=Main page=		=Main page=
	~~Any ideas on the main page? I recently changed the 2009 sets to 2010. --CT~~

	~~Featured article of the day? -- SG~~		Is their anyway to ban spammers? If so, please ban user:Doyle495258. Thanks -- SG

	Yeah... 1) someone would have to change it everyday and 2) we need a good article to show everyday. This may help: [http://editthis.info/wiki/Help:Displaying_a_periodic_featured_article Displaying a periodic featured article]. I guess we don't HAVE to change it everyday. I can add it... do you want to ~~remove anything from the front page~~? ~~--CT~~


	~~=Default page format=~~
	~~I saw that you changed the default page format that I created [[Template~~:~~Preload]]. I like it. Separating the relics from the parallels and inserts is a good idea. I recently added a line for the image. --CT~~

	~~I was thinking of putting a separate section for manufactured "relics~~.~~" What do you think?~~ -- SG

	~~Sounds good. It's much easier to delete preloaded text than have to type it in again and again. --CT~~

Chris at 19:03, 11 February 2010

2010-02-11T19:03:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:03, 11 February 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:

	Featured article of the day? -- SG		Featured article of the day? -- SG

			Yeah... 1) someone would have to change it everyday and 2) we need a good article to show everyday. This may help: [http://editthis.info/wiki/Help:Displaying_a_periodic_featured_article Displaying a periodic featured article]. I guess we don't HAVE to change it everyday. I can add it... do you want to remove anything from the front page? --CT


	=Default page format=		=Default page format=
Line 8:		Line 11:

	I was thinking of putting a separate section for manufactured "relics." What do you think? -- SG		I was thinking of putting a separate section for manufactured "relics." What do you think? -- SG

			Sounds good. It's much easier to delete preloaded text than have to type it in again and again. --CT

Stalegum at 17:32, 11 February 2010

2010-02-11T17:32:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:32, 11 February 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=Main page=		=Main page=
	Any ideas on the main page? I recently changed the 2009 sets to 2010. --CT		Any ideas on the main page? I recently changed the 2009 sets to 2010. --CT

			Featured article of the day? -- SG

	=Default page format=		=Default page format=
	I saw that you changed the default page format that I created [[Template:Preload]]. I like it. Separating the relics from the parallels and inserts is a good idea. I recently added a line for the image. --CT		I saw that you changed the default page format that I created [[Template:Preload]]. I like it. Separating the relics from the parallels and inserts is a good idea. I recently added a line for the image. --CT

			I was thinking of putting a separate section for manufactured "relics." What do you think? -- SG
	~~>Thanks for cleaning up the '07 Goudey article.~~

	~~No problem. Now there's two articles on 2009 Unique. We should delete one, which one? -Chris~~

	~~Delete "2009 Topps Unique" and re-name "2009 Unique" as "2009 Topps Unique" -- SG~~
	~~Done. -CT~~

	~~=Thoughts on the long pages=~~
	~~My preference is for shorter cover articles with links to the checklists. Kinda like what~~ I was ~~doing~~ for [[2006 Bowman Heritage]]. I just worry that the really long sets like 2005 Prime Patches or 2007 UD Black would have really, really long pages. Now for pages like [[1949 Bowman]] - it makes sense to just go ahead and put the checklist on the front page. What do you think? ~~[[User:Big Mamou\|Big Mamou]] 00:34, 4 February 2010 (UTC)~~

	~~For most of the longer, game~~-~~used~~-~~intensive, sets, this would be the way to go. But for most sets (like Topps and Upper Deck's flagships) everything on one page would suffice.~~
	~~--[[User:Stalegum\|Stalegum]] 06:53, 4 February 2010 (UTC)~~

Chris at 16:21, 11 February 2010

2010-02-11T16:21:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:21, 11 February 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
			=Main page=
			Any ideas on the main page? I recently changed the 2009 sets to 2010. --CT

	=Default page format=		=Default page format=
	I saw that you changed the default page format that I created [[Template:Preload]]. I like it. Separating the relics from the parallels and inserts is a good idea. I recently added a line for the image. -CT		I saw that you changed the default page format that I created [[Template:Preload]]. I like it. Separating the relics from the parallels and inserts is a good idea. I recently added a line for the image. --CT

Chris at 16:10, 11 February 2010

2010-02-11T16:10:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:10, 11 February 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	=Default page format=		=Default page format=
	I saw that you changed the default page format that I created [[Template:Preload]]. I like it. Separating the relics from the parallels and inserts is a good idea. I recently added a line for the image.		I saw that you changed the default page format that I created [[Template:Preload]]. I like it. Separating the relics from the parallels and inserts is a good idea. I recently added a line for the image. -CT

Chris at 16:10, 11 February 2010

2010-02-11T16:10:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:10, 11 February 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
			=Default page format=
			I saw that you changed the default page format that I created [[Template:Preload]]. I like it. Separating the relics from the parallels and inserts is a good idea. I recently added a line for the image.


	>Thanks for cleaning up the '07 Goudey article.		>Thanks for cleaning up the '07 Goudey article.

Chris at 15:32, 4 February 2010

2010-02-04T15:32:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:32, 4 February 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Delete "2009 Topps Unique" and re-name "2009 Unique" as "2009 Topps Unique" -- SG		Delete "2009 Topps Unique" and re-name "2009 Unique" as "2009 Topps Unique" -- SG
			Done. -CT

	=Thoughts on the long pages=		=Thoughts on the long pages=

Stalegum: /* Thoughts on the long pages */

2010-02-04T06:53:47Z

Thoughts on the long pages

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:53, 4 February 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	=Thoughts on the long pages=		=Thoughts on the long pages=
	My preference is for shorter cover articles with links to the checklists. Kinda like what I was doing for [[2006 Bowman Heritage]]. I just worry that the really long sets like 2005 Prime Patches or 2007 UD Black would have really, really long pages. Now for pages like [[1949 Bowman]] - it makes sense to just go ahead and put the checklist on the front page. What do you think? [[User:Big Mamou\|Big Mamou]] 00:34, 4 February 2010 (UTC)		My preference is for shorter cover articles with links to the checklists. Kinda like what I was doing for [[2006 Bowman Heritage]]. I just worry that the really long sets like 2005 Prime Patches or 2007 UD Black would have really, really long pages. Now for pages like [[1949 Bowman]] - it makes sense to just go ahead and put the checklist on the front page. What do you think? [[User:Big Mamou\|Big Mamou]] 00:34, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

			For most of the longer, game-used-intensive, sets, this would be the way to go. But for most sets (like Topps and Upper Deck's flagships) everything on one page would suffice.
			--[[User:Stalegum\|Stalegum]] 06:53, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Big Mamou at 00:34, 4 February 2010

2010-02-04T00:34:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:34, 3 February 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Delete "2009 Topps Unique" and re-name "2009 Unique" as "2009 Topps Unique" -- SG		Delete "2009 Topps Unique" and re-name "2009 Unique" as "2009 Topps Unique" -- SG

			=Thoughts on the long pages=
			My preference is for shorter cover articles with links to the checklists. Kinda like what I was doing for [[2006 Bowman Heritage]]. I just worry that the really long sets like 2005 Prime Patches or 2007 UD Black would have really, really long pages. Now for pages like [[1949 Bowman]] - it makes sense to just go ahead and put the checklist on the front page. What do you think? [[User:Big Mamou\|Big Mamou]] 00:34, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Stalegum at 20:27, 28 January 2010

2010-01-28T20:27:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:27, 28 January 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	No problem. Now there's two articles on 2009 Unique. We should delete one, which one? -Chris		No problem. Now there's two articles on 2009 Unique. We should delete one, which one? -Chris

			Delete "2009 Topps Unique" and re-name "2009 Unique" as "2009 Topps Unique" -- SG