User:Big Mamou - Revision history

Chris: Removing all content from page

2010-01-24T04:03:26Z

Removing all content from page

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:03, 24 January 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~>Indeed we should.~~

	~~My thoughts exactly!~~

	~~>I kinda like the editor on your site better plus I might be able to access it from work...~~

	Great! Currently, the wiki is hosted by me, which is good. I (we) have complete access to the software (and hardware), so we can customize the wiki to our needs. There are tons of extensions that can be installed to this wiki system. If you prefer this system over your current one, then we should think of a way to move all of your work into this wiki. If you prefer yours, then let me know as I'm not familiar with that particular wiki system. I'd like to keep it only baseball.

	~~>What do you think?~~

	~~I'm excited. The more people who are willing to help, all the better!~~


	~~>I like your general entries for each set. But I also really like the individual smaller articles for insert sets and the like.~~

	Yeah, I've been thinking about the structure. I like the all of the insert checklists on a single page (so I don't click elsewhere when I lookup information on a particular set), but the pages can get very long. Maybe we can list the checklists and create additional pages with more detailed information.

Chris at 02:44, 24 January 2010

2010-01-24T02:44:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:44, 23 January 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	>Indeed we should.		>Indeed we should.

	My thoughts exactly!		My thoughts exactly!

	>I kinda like the editor on your site better plus I might be able to access it from work...		>I kinda like the editor on your site better plus I might be able to access it from work...

	Great! Currently, the wiki is hosted by me, which is good. I (we) have complete access to the software (and hardware), so we can customize the wiki to our needs. There are tons of extensions that can be installed to this wiki system. If you prefer this system over your current one, then we should think of a way to move all of your work into this wiki. If you prefer yours, then let me know as I'm not familiar with that particular wiki system. I'd like to keep it only baseball.		Great! Currently, the wiki is hosted by me, which is good. I (we) have complete access to the software (and hardware), so we can customize the wiki to our needs. There are tons of extensions that can be installed to this wiki system. If you prefer this system over your current one, then we should think of a way to move all of your work into this wiki. If you prefer yours, then let me know as I'm not familiar with that particular wiki system. I'd like to keep it only baseball.

	>What do you think?		>What do you think?

	I'm excited. The more people who are willing to help, all the better!		I'm excited. The more people who are willing to help, all the better!


	>I like your general entries for each set. But I also really like the individual smaller articles for insert sets and the like.		>I like your general entries for each set. But I also really like the individual smaller articles for insert sets and the like.

	Yeah, I've been thinking about the structure. I like the all of the insert checklists on a single page (so I don't click elsewhere when I lookup information on a particular set), but the pages can get very long. Maybe we can list the checklists and create additional pages with more detailed information.		Yeah, I've been thinking about the structure. I like the all of the insert checklists on a single page (so I don't click elsewhere when I lookup information on a particular set), but the pages can get very long. Maybe we can list the checklists and create additional pages with more detailed information.

Chris at 02:44, 24 January 2010

2010-01-24T02:44:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:44, 23 January 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	>Indeed we should.		>Indeed we should.
	My ~~thought~~ exactly!		My thoughts exactly!

	>I kinda like the editor on your site better plus I might be able to access it from work...		>I kinda like the editor on your site better plus I might be able to access it from work...

Chris: New page: >Indeed we should. My thought exactly! >I kinda like the editor on your site better plus I might be able to access it from work... Great! Currently, the wiki is hosted by me, which is goo...

2010-01-24T02:44:02Z

New page: >Indeed we should. My thought exactly! >I kinda like the editor on your site better plus I might be able to access it from work... Great! Currently, the wiki is hosted by me, which is goo...

New page

>Indeed we should.
My thought exactly!

>I kinda like the editor on your site better plus I might be able to access it from work...
Great! Currently, the wiki is hosted by me, which is good. I (we) have complete access to the software (and hardware), so we can customize the wiki to our needs. There are tons of extensions that can be installed to this wiki system. If you prefer this system over your current one, then we should think of a way to move all of your work into this wiki. If you prefer yours, then let me know as I'm not familiar with that particular wiki system. I'd like to keep it only baseball.

>What do you think?
I'm excited. The more people who are willing to help, all the better!

>I like your general entries for each set. But I also really like the individual smaller articles for insert sets and the like.
Yeah, I've been thinking about the structure. I like the all of the insert checklists on a single page (so I don't click elsewhere when I lookup information on a particular set), but the pages can get very long. Maybe we can list the checklists and create additional pages with more detailed information.