<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://baseballcardpedia.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=1952_Topps_Andy_Pafko</id>
	<title>1952 Topps Andy Pafko - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://baseballcardpedia.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=1952_Topps_Andy_Pafko"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://baseballcardpedia.com/index.php?title=1952_Topps_Andy_Pafko&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-12T13:26:15Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.44.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://baseballcardpedia.com/index.php?title=1952_Topps_Andy_Pafko&amp;diff=376&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Stalegum: New page: &#039;&#039;&#039;1952 Topps Andy Pafko:&#039;&#039;&#039; Why, oh why, is a career .285 hitter considered &quot;significant?&quot; Well, Andy Pafko holds the distinction of being the very first card in what is considered to be ...</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://baseballcardpedia.com/index.php?title=1952_Topps_Andy_Pafko&amp;diff=376&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2009-12-23T03:38:09Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;New page: &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;1952 Topps Andy Pafko:&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Why, oh why, is a career .285 hitter considered &amp;quot;significant?&amp;quot; Well, Andy Pafko holds the distinction of being the very first card in what is considered to be ...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;1952 Topps Andy Pafko:&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Why, oh why, is a career .285 hitter considered &amp;quot;significant?&amp;quot; Well, Andy Pafko holds the distinction of being the very first card in what is considered to be the first &amp;quot;real&amp;quot; baseball card set of the post-WWII era, 1952 Topps. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Big deal, right? Keep in mind that this was 1952. It would be at least a quarter century before baseball cards would be looked upon as &amp;quot;collectibles&amp;quot; with investment value. Therefore, it was not uncommon for the collectors of the era, (read: kids), to store their baseball cards in rubber band bounded stacks. As the top card of such stacks, Pafko&amp;#039;s card tended to receive a bit more abuse than others. The rubber bands had the tendency to &amp;quot;dig&amp;quot; into the sides of the card, creating a &amp;quot;[[notch]].&amp;quot; Needless to say, there aren&amp;#039;t that many Pafko&amp;#039;s in excellent condition much less in mint condition. So yeah, it is a big deal.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In 1999 a &amp;#039;52 Topps Pafko, pulled fresh from a near half-century old pack and graded Mint &amp;quot;9&amp;quot; by PSA, sold for $83,870 at auction. Not bad for a career .285 hitter.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Significant Cards]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Stalegum</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>